Unfamiliar questions in the Arab air: As al-Qaeda scores own-goals in its backyard, many Arabs, including some Iraqis, are beginning to rethink their position on violence in the name of resistance (The Economist, Nov 24th 2005)

The global al-Qaeda franchise, whose Iraqi branch claimed responsibility for the Amman atrocity, has scored many own-goals over the years. The carnage in such Muslim cities as Istanbul, Casablanca, Sharm el-Sheikh and Riyadh has alienated the very Muslim masses the jihadists claim to be serving. By bringing home the human cost of such violence, they have even stripped away the shameful complacency with which the Sunni Muslim majority in other Arab countries has tended to regard attacks by Iraq’s Sunni insurgent “heroes” against “collaborationist” Shia mosque congregations, funeral processions and police stations.

In Amman, al-Qaeda’s victims included not only Mr Akkad and his daughter Rima, a mother of two, but also dozens of guests at a Palestinian wedding. The slaughter of so many innocents, nearly all of them Sunni Muslims, in the heart of a peaceful Arab capital, inspired a region-wide wave of revulsion. Far from being perceived now as a sort of Muslim Braveheart, the man who planned the attack, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, may be the most reviled person in Jordan, the country of his birth. His own tribe, which had previously taken some pride in its association with the Iraqi resistance, has publicly disowned him. Tens of thousands of Jordanians have taken to the streets of Amman to denounce terrorism. Opinion polls, which had previously shown Jordanians to be at best ambivalent about jihadist violence, now show overwhelming distaste for it (see tables).

Similar changes in attitude have overtaken other Arab societies. Some 150,000 Moroccans marched in Casablanca earlier this month to protest against al-Qaeda’s threat to kill two junior Moroccan diplomats kidnapped on the road to Baghdad. The execution by Mr Zarqawi’s men of two Algerian diplomats and the Egyptian chargé d’affaires in Iraq earlier this year aroused similar indignation in their home countries. Two years of bloody jihadist attacks in Saudi Arabia have rudely shaken the once-considerable sympathy for radical Islamism in the conservative kingdom. A top Saudi security source reckons that 80% of the country’s success in staunching violence is due to such shifts in public feeling, and only 20% to police work. […]

Noteworthy in all these subtle shifts is the fact that they are, by and large, internally generated. Few of them have come about as a result of prodding or policy initiatives from the West.

Which is like arguing that because the Counter-Reformation was internal to the Catholic Church it was not a product of the Reformation.


  1. This “internal revolt” will only widen if the terrorists continue to blast away at other Muslims. If they turned from that course, all this “internal introspection” would instantly cease. So, it is only a self-serving introspection that would stop once the “correct” infidels were being murdered, I’m afraid.

    In my view, the only way we can get the countries in the Mid East to begin to stop terrorists is in one of two ways. 1) it will come as a result of further democratic reform, or 2) it will happen when western nations band together and put a hurt on those countries in multiple ways, from sanctions and economics to outright military destruction.

    Westerners just won’t be able to expect that things will turn around quickly with the first option, though. It is the work of decades and a lot of blood spilled in the mean time.

    And number two is a dreamers idea if he thinks that Europe will ever so band together with each other, much less the USA!

    This is why I support number one, if we don’t weaken in or resolve to keep the pressure up politically within the US itself.

%d bloggers like this: