WHY IS DEMOCRAT PROTECTIONISM EMBARRASSING TO THE GOP?:

A Setback for Vietnam Trade Bill (STEVEN R. WEISMAN, 11/14/06, NY Times)

In an embarrassing legislative setback for the administration, the House of Representatives defeated a measure late Monday that the president had sought to normalize trade relations with Vietnam, four days before President Bush was scheduled to leave for his first visit to that country. […]

The legislation received a majority vote but fell short of the two-thirds needed for passage under special rules that speeded its consideration in the House. The vote came on the first day of the lame-duck session in which the outgoing House, still controlled by a Republican majority, met to pass crucial bills by the end of this year.

The legislation received 228 votes in favor and 161 against, but it needed 32 more votes to pass on Monday. House Republican leaders said they would bring the legislation back in the next couple of days under normal procedures, which require only a majority, or 218 votes, for passage.

Though perhaps symbolic, the defeat in the House was an embarrassment not only for Mr. Bush but also for the departing Republican leaders, who had earlier in the day expressed confidence that they had the two-thirds needed for the bill to pass in the House.

Advertisements

2 Responses to WHY IS DEMOCRAT PROTECTIONISM EMBARRASSING TO THE GOP?:

  1. Rick T says:

    Should be an embarassment for the Democrats who owe the Vietnamese much,
    much more than a trade bill.

  2. JimBobElrod says:

    Because the Lamestream Media types frame the story as an embarrassment for the GOP?
    The Dems would never do anything to embarrass W and it would never be reported that way.

%d bloggers like this: